Tuesday, November 22, 2005

Baby for sale

9 Comments:

At 10:36 AM, Anonymous Jay said...

Horrible Connotation ... the title.

 
At 9:45 PM, Blogger Anurag said...

Jay, the title is totally bening, I must assure you. Interpretations are always subjective. :)

 
At 9:56 PM, Anonymous Gina said...

This is one of my favourites from the roll you shot that day. When are you posting the pic of stuff Fiza was selling?

 
At 2:31 PM, Blogger Senthil said...

Love the expression on her face. My request - the one with all those glasses. The abstract-ish one.

 
At 8:51 PM, Blogger Dilip D'Souza said...

Anurag, just a thought if I may be frank. With photographing kids, there's a simple rule to make your photos better (though I realize rules are meant to be observed in the breach): get down to their level. i.e. Don't have them looking up at you.

I think this photograph, nice as it is, might have benefited from that kind of perspective.

Hi Gina!

 
At 1:30 AM, Blogger Docs Dope said...

baby for sale....how much is it for?

 
At 3:00 AM, Blogger Anurag said...

Gina: up next.

Senthil: - do -

Dilip: Thanks for the tip. I keep forgetting to do so. Will remember it for future.

docs dope: didn't ask. :)

 
At 2:42 PM, Blogger wendigo said...

waah. kya photu hai... keep it up.

 
At 8:53 PM, Blogger GettingThere said...

I know late comment. Maybe no one will even see it - but couldn't resist. Dilip, I agree that while shooting pics of kids, you should get down to their level. But in this pic, I think the effect (of looking at the items as a prospective buyer) would have been diminished in doing so. That angle suits the title - as in the photographer is just looking down at the "things" for sale. The subject of the picture is NOT the boy, but all the items together.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home